LGBTQ couples in South Korea enjoy a rare legal win for health benefits
The Wall Street Journal reports on LGBTQ acceptance and speaks with UC Law's Ryan Thoreson
LGBTQ individuals continue to face challenges in gaining public acceptance of same-sex couples in South Korea. But that community enjoyed a win earlier this year thanks to a mix up in joint family coverage with the nation’s public health insurer.
The case involving fairness for Kim Young-min and So Sung-uk ended up before South Korea’s Supreme Court when their health benefits were rescinded. A hard fought legal battle eventually produced a landmark victory earlier this year. The high court’s chief justice called the rescinding of health benefits an act of discrimination that “violates human dignity and value.”
The Wall Street Journal reported the story, which also appeared recently on MSN, and spoke with Ryan Thoreson, an assistant professor in the University of Cincinnati College of Law.
Ryan Thoreson is an assistant professor at UC Law.
South Korean activists and lawyers say the Supreme Court’s recent ruling affects joint health coverage, but is likely applicable to a wider range of government services and entitlements.
Thoreson told The Wall Street Journal that once courts provide same-sex couples the protections afforded to married households, the argument against marriage equality for LGBTQ individuals becomes increasingly difficult.
Furthermore, the more visibility LGBTQ couples have in society, like Kim and So in South Korea, the more accepting the public becomes of such causes, added Thoreson, who is also a specialist on LGBTQ right for Human Rights Watch
“The public storytelling around these cases is essential for non-LGBTQ people to understand what’s at stake,” Thoreson told The Wall Street Journal.
Two-fifths of South Koreans support same-sex marriage, according to the Pew Research Center. That is lower than the Asia-wide median of roughly 50%, Pew said.
Thoreson, who received his JD at Yale University, is a scholar of contemporary social movements around gender and sexuality, constitutional law, comparative and international law and human rights law.
Read the full story from The Wall Street Journal story online.
Learn more about the scholarship of UC Law’s Ryan Thoreson online.
Related Stories
Marcus Sapp says he’s finally free after wrongful murder charges tossed
September 8, 2024
Marcus Sapp, an Ohio Innocence Project exoneree, spoke with The Cincinnati Enquirer about his journey to freedom following a wrongful murder conviction. OIP at UC Law took his case and uncovered exculpatory evidence that should have been presented during his initial trial.
The debate over the death penalty
October 30, 2024
WVXU Cincinnati Edition host Lucy May Interviewers Pierce Reed, director of policy and engagement for the Ohio Innocence Project at UC Law as part of a discussion on the death penalty. UC Law will host a Nov. 1 roundtable on the topic featuring former Ohio death row inmate Lamont Hunter, his attorney Erin Gallagher Barnhart,an assistant federal public defender and Dr. Robert J. Norris, a criminologist at George Mason University.
What is exoneration for individuals wrongly convicted of a crime?
October 17, 2024
Tara Rosnell, chair of the Ohio Innocence Project's Board of Advocates, spoke recently with WYSO public radio station about how exoneration works for individuals wrongly convicted for crimes they did not commit. OIP at UC Law helped 42 people secure their freedom. The group of clients collectively spent more than 800 years behind bars for crimes they didn’t do.