Exploring the current use and future of alternatives to traditional informed consent in acute stroke trials
MSN highlights editorial authored by UC experts
MSN highlighted an editorial written by the University of Cincinnati’s Yasmin Aziz, MD, and Joseph Broderick, MD, published Nov. 7 in the journal Neurology analyzing the current use and potential future of alternatives to traditional informed consent in acute stroke trials.
Patient informed consent is a crucial part of ethical clinical trial design and implementation, but time is of the essence for stroke trials. Approximately 2 million neurons die each minute they are deprived of oxygen, and patients are also sometimes incapacitated and therefore unable to consent to a trial, highlighting the need for emergency consent in certain cases.
There is currently no worldwide standard for emergency consent for stroke trials, with various approaches taken by different countries.
“This editorial is intended to educate the greater neurology community about these consent procedures and their current relevance to stroke research in particular,” said Aziz, assistant professor in the Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine in UC’s College of Medicine and a UC Health physician.
Broderick is principal investigator of the FASTEST trial, the first acute stroke trial in the United States to use exception from informed consent (EFIC) protocols.
“...Community consultation and public disclosure are unique to EFIC,” the authors wrote. “Both requirements can be quite expensive and time-consuming, delaying study start-up. Efforts to make EFIC more efficient and less costly in the US are ongoing.”
The coauthors noted as the field continues to explore the most effective and efficient alternatives to prospective informed consent, the “principles of patient autonomy and beneficence remain imperative.” Aziz said improving consent procedures is an opportunity to “keep moving the chains forward” for stroke research.
“The United States in particular has a very dark, very recent, unethical history with certain populations and the performance of clinical research,” she said. “We need to find the best way to honor patient autonomy while moving research forward to ultimately get better treatments to the bedside.”
Neuro Rehab Times also covered the editorial. Read the Neuro Rehab Times article.
Featured photo at top of brain scans. Photo courtesy of Joseph Broderick.
Related Stories
U.S. News: Scientists propose new mechanism driving Alzheimer's
October 6, 2022
U.S. News & World Report highlighted recent research from the University of Cincinnati that supports the hypothesis that Alzheimer’s disease is caused by a decline in levels of a protein called amyloid-beta.
National publications highlight UC stroke research
February 13, 2023
Several national news outlets highlighted the University of Cincinnati's Eva Mistry presenting on the results of the BEST-II trial at the International Stroke Conference.
Study: Lowering blood pressure after clot removal may not be safe; should be individualized
February 10, 2023
The University of Cincinnati's Eva Mistry presented research that found using medications to lower systolic blood pressure immediately after mechanical clot removal for acute ischemic stroke may not be safe or effective at the International Stroke Conference 2023.